We have compiled a list of manufacturers, distributors, product information, reference prices, and rankings for Construction Machine.
ipros is IPROS GMS IPROS One of the largest technical database sites in Japan that collects information on.

Construction Machine - List of Manufacturers, Suppliers, Companies and Products

Construction Machine Product List

1~2 item / All 2 items

Displayed results

They are completely different! The difference between "piping magnetite method" and "magnetic device."

A thorough comparison of the advantages, such as the elimination of the "magnetic field control every few years" that comes with magnetic devices, and the long-lasting effects of modified water!

■Construction Method 【Piping Magnetite Method】 Install BWΩ in the piping to modify the water passing through the device, converting red rust to black rust and repairing the deteriorated areas with black rust. 【Magnetic Method】 Install a magnetic device in the piping to increase the potential in areas that prevent iron from rusting. ■Construction 【Piping Magnetite Method】 Install at one location on the main water supply pipe. 【Magnetic Method】 Installation of the device is required every 50 meters. ■Maintenance 【Piping Magnetite Method】 No maintenance required. 【Magnetic Method】 The effectiveness weakens if the direction of the magnetic field is not changed every few years. ■Cost and Construction Period 【Piping Magnetite Method】 Particularly low cost compared to other methods, with a short construction period. 【Magnetic Method】 Lower cost and shorter construction period compared to other methods. ■Sustainability of Modified Water Effects 【Piping Magnetite Method】 Lab tests confirmed effects lasting 4 months, and field tests confirmed effects lasting up to 8 years. 【Magnetic Method】 Effects disappear in about 84 hours. ■Environmental Impact 【Piping Magnetite Method】 Produces good water for domestic use and reduces water environmental impact such as wastewater. 【Magnetic Method】 No impact on the water environment. Additionally, comparisons with piping replacement work and lining methods are available in PDF format. For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.

  • Other water treatment equipment

Added to bookmarks

Bookmarks list

Bookmark has been removed

Bookmarks list

You can't add any more bookmarks

By registering as a member, you can increase the number of bookmarks you can save and organize them with labels.

Free membership registration

Cost reduction achievable with the "Gripika" saponification sanitation method.

Cheaper compared to vacuum extraction methods! It can reduce waste disposal costs and more.

We would like to introduce the costs that can be reduced with our soap-based sanitation method, "Gripika." The soap-based sanitation method tends to be cheaper compared to vacuum suction methods, with waste disposal costs and waste transportation costs being zero. Additionally, it is possible to reduce maintenance costs related to drainage pipe blockages, such as repairs and replacements due to clogging. 【Costs that can be reduced】 ■ Waste disposal costs are zero ■ Waste transportation costs are zero ■ Maintenance costs for drainage pipe blockages (repairs and replacements due to clogging) ■ No need for manifest issuance ■ Improved operational efficiency due to environmental improvements ■ No need for high initial investments *For more details, please refer to the related links or feel free to contact us.

  • Food environmental hygiene/contamination prevention equipment

Added to bookmarks

Bookmarks list

Bookmark has been removed

Bookmarks list

You can't add any more bookmarks

By registering as a member, you can increase the number of bookmarks you can save and organize them with labels.

Free membership registration